Verbal reasoning, with its whirl of passages and inference questions, tests more than reading speed; it measures the ability to extract reliable signals from prose noise — an essential skill when scanning clinical notes or digesting new research. Quantitative reasoning, stripped of calculators and context clues, assesses numerical literacy: the quiet competence to convert percentages into prognoses and dosages into meaningful action. Abstract reasoning, often underestimated, reflects pattern recognition and the capacity to see structure in unfamiliar territory — the same mental move clinicians make when spotting atypical presentations. Decision making and situational judgement explicitly probe judgment: weighing probabilities, balancing risks, and prioritizing compassion within constraints.